Properly Molding the Gamer Child

Re:Properly Molding the Gamer Child by eru on Thursday September 17, 2009 @03:13AM (#827599)

I play on the www.diplom.org, which has also a nice zine with a lot of interesting articles. (And gorgeous .ps-maps)

Perhaps we should organize a Hacker game once? Even if we can't find seven diplomats (+ a GM), there are interesting variants for a smaller number of players. Like `Hundred' or `Sail Ho!'.

Ido, what do you think of this article: [http://www.diplom.org/Zine/F1997R/Windsor/lawdip.html]?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Properly Molding the Gamer Child by ido on Friday September 18, 2009 @08:00AM (#830081)

I think it's too long for me to read at the moment ;)

For a lot of the web based ones (including the site I mentioned) you do not need a GM, it is arbitrated by the computer.

It also works a lot quicker and is more user friendly than PBEM.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Properly Molding the Gamer Child by eru on Sunday September 20, 2009 @05:27AM (#832928)

I play in communities where computer arbitration is the norm. Still they require a GM (and I think rightly so) to guide the game, search for replacements and answer questions. (And it is still technically PBEM, because the server uses email as the primary interface.)

However the typical workload for a GM is far lower than without computer arbitration, of course. And you can read all the negotiations, if you want to.

[ Parent | on HN ]