News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Dyson's robot vacuum took 16 years, and why it's head... by Magicstatic on Friday September 05, 2014 @04:09AM (#8272776)
I'm still impressed by the fact that Dyson made a fan with no...fans.
Re:Why Dyson's robot vacuum took 16 years, and why it's head... by facepalm on Friday September 05, 2014 @04:21AM (#8272802)
They didn't. The fan is integrated in the base. Actually the fan example is exactly what makes me look at any Dyson announcements with a lot of skepticism.
Re:Why Dyson's robot vacuum took 16 years, and why it's head... by Stulander on Friday September 05, 2014 @05:58AM (#8273067)
That and "digital motors".
Re:Why Dyson's robot vacuum took 16 years, and why it's head... by jonnydark on Friday September 05, 2014 @05:53AM (#8273055)
It's a bladeless fan, not a fanless fan. It works using an impeller in the base and it feeds the air through a thin gap in an annulus shaped aerofoil. Strictly speaking you could argue that impellers have blades and all they've done is conceal them inside the base rather than remove them entirely. A truly bladeless fan would use something like an electrostatic fluid accelerator to accelerate particles with an electric field - but that's probably a little too sci-fi for a consumer electronics company!
Re:Why Dyson's robot vacuum took 16 years, and why it's head... by revjx on Friday September 05, 2014 @07:26AM (#8273285)
Jonny, you're RUINING THE MAGIC

Good to see other Dyson people on here.