News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A case against syntax highlighting by informatimago on Wednesday September 03, 2014 @06:46AM (#8262330)
"Conclusions[...] Syntax highlighting doesn't improve legibility."

Yes. And the author completely missed the point of syntax highlighting: it's not useful to read the code, it's useful to WRITE the code!

It's when writing it that you want some early syntactic (and slight semantic) feedback.

If you type a keyword and it highlight like a function name, you get a hint that you have a typo in your keyword.

If you type a function name and it highlight as a type, or as an undefined token, you get the same hint.

And so on.

Just like automatic indentation of the code does provide you good syntactic hints about your parenthesizing (or brackets or begin/end etc), and let you notice at once when something's unbalanced or misplaced.

(This is also the reason why python is bad: editors can't do automatic indentation of python code.)

Re:A case against syntax highlighting by carlsmith on Wednesday September 03, 2014 @06:52AM (#8262338)
Editors can, and normally do, automatically indent Python.
Re:A case against syntax highlighting by carlsmith on Wednesday September 03, 2014 @06:57AM (#8262349)
This is a much stronger case against highlighting English and against using really nasty themes, which no one considered good ideas to begin with.