News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google Chrome 3.0 by cmalabs on Wednesday September 16, 2009 @08:48AM (#825674)
"Chrome includes video codecs that allow you to embed videos without using slow and unreliable plug-ins like Adobe Flash."

Compared to quicktime/media player and the slew of plugins from the previous generation, flash is much much more reliable.

Re:Google Chrome 3.0 by dchest on Wednesday September 16, 2009 @09:03AM (#825697)
Compared to QuickTime _on Windows_. On Mac it's not so slow and doesn't load CPU that much (compared to Flash/Mac).
Re:Google Chrome 3.0 by nestlequ1k on Wednesday September 16, 2009 @04:11PM (#826713)
Bullshit. Load a hour long quicktime video from blip tv using safari. It will hang your browser every time. This is on a latest gen Macbook Pro
Re:Google Chrome 3.0 by acdha on Wednesday September 16, 2009 @09:41AM (#825761)
If you want the lowest common quality video, yes. Flash video performance and quality are noticeably lower, though, so it really doesn't scale well beyond YouTube-level video.

In practice, widely deployed beat better quality handily.