Mosh: A replacement for SSH

Re:Mosh: A replacement for SSH by quotemstr on Monday September 01, 2014 @08:36AM (#8252530)

I'm still optimistic that we'll support RFC 6275 before we're all dead.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Mosh: A replacement for SSH by Piskvorrr on Monday September 01, 2014 @08:48AM (#8252564)

I for one hope that I won't need to support it after I'm dead.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Mosh: A replacement for SSH by anonbanker on Wednesday September 03, 2014 @12:13PM (#8263704)

Let's assume for a moment that RFC6725 is implemented in pacemakers or artificial organs. How long after death would/should these devices remain active? could we use Mobile ipv6 to communicate with the recently-departed loved ones to send final well-wishes?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Mosh: A replacement for SSH by Piskvorrr on Thursday September 04, 2014 @04:55AM (#8267275)

Let us assume the moon is made of cheese. Now let's discuss the feasibility of a cheese-mining colony there.

I, for one, look forward to communicating with a deceased person's gallbladder.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Mosh: A replacement for SSH by anonbanker on Thursday September 04, 2014 @05:07AM (#8267297)

https://warosu.org/data/vr/img/0014/96/1395782839524.jpg

Perhaps replying with a non-sequitor is why you were downvoted?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Mosh: A replacement for SSH by Piskvorrr on Wednesday September 10, 2014 @05:49AM (#8295759)

In other words, perhaps more seriously: If your initial assumption doesn't make sense, then the whole argument is nonsensical.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Mosh: A replacement for SSH by anonbanker on Wednesday September 10, 2014 @12:45PM (#8297464)

Maybe you can explain why implementing RFC6725 in pacemakers and other artificial organs doesn't make sense?

[ Parent | on HN ]