If the results are true, it's not surprising when we see economics as politics, and economic statements as ultimately moral ones. (Why organize production/consumption/allocation one way, rather than zillions of alternative ways? Does the economic system not affect society's power structures? Don't we spend over half our weekdays as producers, under boss rule?)

Econ-as-morality becomes clear when we discuss challengers/improvements to capitalism, and flamewars erupt. (And not just unimaginative alternatives like Soviet socialism, as if the only alternative to Coke is Pepsi...)

What do we know about capitalism's properties? Its supporters constantly talk about the moral benefits of sociopathic behavior. They say it harnesses humanity's greed... as if that's the only emotion to consider. (Rather than saying it rewards greed and punishes empathy.) So what else do we expect from courses in captalist doctrine?

And this is obvious when we imagine (largely uncritical) training in any other economic system; training in morality.