News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Introducing a more powerful Dropbox Pro by hemancuso on Wednesday August 27, 2014 @01:26PM (#8233378)
I meant in one filesystem. No obvious way to construct a single zpool anywhere near that big.

And if not one filesystem, curious how it would work in practice.

Re:Introducing a more powerful Dropbox Pro by rsync on Wednesday August 27, 2014 @03:40PM (#8234296)
We currently allow 1.1 PB in a single "namespace" (zpool).

There are non-obvious ways to make a petabyte-sized zpool non-scary ... but even with those employed we still utilize raidz3 and have contingencies for rollbacks.

edit: for obvious reasons, that 1.1 PB number will grow by 50% in the very near future...

Re:Introducing a more powerful Dropbox Pro by hemancuso on Wednesday August 27, 2014 @09:37PM (#8235542)
It's easy enough to jam enough disks into a rack with these 90disk 4u super micro jbods. The thing that always scared me (ESP with rsync) is how do you get performant metadata for a few billion files? Or even tens of millions.

And raidz3 resilver must be horrible at those densities!

Again. Just curious. Email at jmancuso@expandrive if you feel like chatting. I know we offer a similar product, but we are about to leave zfs for the above concerns. Wouldn't mind sending some business your way.

Re:Introducing a more powerful Dropbox Pro by jacquesct on Sunday August 31, 2014 @08:49AM (#8249181)
Any hints at what filesystem you are moving Strongspace over to? Assuming that you will be moving off SmartOS as well?
Re:Introducing a more powerful Dropbox Pro by hemancuso on Wednesday September 03, 2014 @12:14PM (#8263709)
Distributed object storage

Filesystem: ExpanDrive :)