News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Wayland in Gnome: two progress reports by pippy on Sunday August 24, 2014 @10:29PM (#8220331)
Each time I've attempted to use Linux as my main OS it's always X11 that scares me off. Booting into console to edit xorg.conf gets tiring after a while, spending hundreds of dollars for graphics card that has more stable drivers, the general ancient 90's feel. I've tried it multiple times, but gave up each time.
Re:Wayland in Gnome: two progress reports by mercurial on Monday August 25, 2014 @02:15AM (#8220781)
Per default, you don't have xorg.conf anymore on modern distros. I have been in the "edit xorg.conf" boat as well, but there have been tremendous improvements since the bad old days.
Re:Wayland in Gnome: two progress reports by 1_player on Sunday August 24, 2014 @11:07PM (#8220414)
You may be surprised by the latest versions, then.

I haven't edited xorg.conf in a long time (years?). And I'm using a power user oriented distro, Arch Linux.

Re:Wayland in Gnome: two progress reports by TD-Linux on Sunday August 24, 2014 @11:24PM (#8220454)
As long as you use the open source drivers, you'll be fine. And lucky for you, the cheapest graphics cards (Intel integrated and AMD) have the best open source support.
Re:Wayland in Gnome: two progress reports by donniezazen on Monday August 25, 2014 @03:02AM (#8220876)
Again this is very subjective. I have never had to mess with xorg. Things like Nvidia Optimus are obviously a tipping point of the problem.