News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Please review the new tarsnap website by bdr on Sunday September 13, 2009 @08:01PM (#820783)
It's definitely an improvement, but still looks unprofessional. Good enough for now if you want to keep working on the code.
Re:Please review the new tarsnap website by moe on Sunday September 13, 2009 @08:08PM (#820790)
As a unix-nerd I actually find the barebones, technical look very appealing. It's almost googlesque.

I certainly like it better than the glossy competitors with their sneaky marketing-speak and buzzword bingo.

Re:Please review the new tarsnap website by cperciva on Sunday September 13, 2009 @08:16PM (#820803)
I actually find the barebones, technical look very appealing. It's almost googlesque.

Thanks! The google-like "clean" style is very much what I was aiming for.

Re:Please review the new tarsnap website by tptacek on Sunday September 13, 2009 @10:03PM (#820942)
Then for gods sake ditch Times New Roman. You'd be 10x Googlier if you'd just switch from font-family: serif to font-family: Arial.
Re:Please review the new tarsnap website by moe on Sunday September 13, 2009 @11:24PM (#821020)
Fun fact: He only specified serif for the headlines. Perhaps it's you who should ditch Times as your default font?

You have a point, though, in that he should explicitly put 'sans' in his CSS for the 99% of the population who can't be bothered to change their browser default font.

Re:Please review the new tarsnap website by tptacek on Monday September 14, 2009 @12:46PM (#822017)
Is IE's default Arial? Because his site looks nothing like Google in Firefox or Safari, and is, I believe, one CSS line away from fixing that.
Re:Please review the new tarsnap website by cperciva on Monday September 14, 2009 @12:55PM (#822032)
I'm not sure exactly what IE's default is, but adding font-family: sans-serif to div.boxcontents makes the site look much better.
Re:Please review the new tarsnap website by cperciva on Sunday September 13, 2009 @08:13PM (#820798)
What would make the site look more professional? More text? Less text? A logo? A picture of a house burning down along with a smiling man saying "I don't care if my house burns down, because I know all my data is safely stored with tarsnap"?

Ok, that last one is facetious -- but in all seriousness, I'd love to hear something more specific than "unprofessional".

Re:Please review the new tarsnap website by bdr on Sunday September 13, 2009 @11:03PM (#821003)
- At least choose a font for your title.

- "can probably be compiled on many other UNIX-like operating systems" comes across well from one nerd to another, but probably not to managers. This gets into the question of who your target audience is.

- In the intro, talk about what tarsnap does instead of just saying it's a secure online backup service and talking about the "client code". What makes you different from the hundreds of other backup services?

- The red yellow and blue color scheme isn't doing it for me. Looks better if you make the red yellow, but I know you want to draw attention to the call to action.

- The gap between the left column and the news is ugly. Consider not having news on this page at all.

Re:Please review the new tarsnap website by rms on Sunday September 13, 2009 @08:48PM (#820845)
As a start, I would say yes, get a logo -- even if it is just the exact same as your current non-logo run through Photoshop/GIMP's anti-aliasing.