News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:fork() can fail by acdha on Thursday August 21, 2014 @09:37AM (#8207254)
Technically true but most of the [admittededly modest] Go code I've seen had that error punt all over the place. I really wish they'd learned from C and either banned assigning _ for errors or threw a compiler error if the next line wasn't a _ check.

On second thought, it'd probably avoid some nasty production failures if that behaviour was true for everything which can return an error.

There are no comments on this comment yet.