Re:Dynamically Typed Languages (2009)
by mercurial on Thursday August 21, 2014 @05:23AM
(#8206531)
I'm not saying it's not clunky, but all in all it's fairly pragmatic. That said, I'm a big Python fan as well. Of all the dynamic languages I work/worked with, it's the one that tries hardest to be less of a footgun, and it has a strong tradition of decent documentation (hear, hear, OCaml library developers...).
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.