News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Github and Engineyard part ways by scott_s on Friday September 11, 2009 @06:35PM (#818280)
And what if GitHub can't afford EngineYard?
Re:Github and Engineyard part ways by marclove on Friday September 11, 2009 @06:50PM (#818300)
I find that hard to believe. They're one of the most popular and successful companies in the Ruby community and they have paid accounts that they've been collecting on for quite some time now. EY has thousands of customers who pay them every month and can afford it. How would it be that one of their most popular customers who doesn't pay anything for hosting wouldn't be able to pay them for once?
Re:Github and Engineyard part ways by grandalf on Friday September 11, 2009 @11:07PM (#818560)
EY is super expensive. Also most of the cost is for support techs who can read/understand ruby code and gems. Chances are the github guys don't really need that.
Re:Github and Engineyard part ways by technoweenie on Monday September 14, 2009 @11:00AM (#821765)
How many of those customers have VC funding? Github is completely bootstrapped.
Re:Github and Engineyard part ways by freetard on Saturday September 12, 2009 @02:12AM (#818695)
scott_s is scott shacon and works for github
Re:Github and Engineyard part ways by ptomato on Saturday September 12, 2009 @02:56AM (#818719)
Re:Github and Engineyard part ways by scott_s on Saturday September 12, 2009 @01:06PM (#819148)
Indeed, I am not Scott Shacon. Too many Scott's! One time in undergrad three of us sat in a column and confused the hell out of our compiler's professor.
Re:Github and Engineyard part ways by ionfish on Saturday September 12, 2009 @08:46AM (#818860)
No, it's not. Scott Chacon's surname starts with a C, not an S.

http://github.com/schacon

http://progit.org/