News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What's the matter with PGP? by bradleyjg on Wednesday August 13, 2014 @03:40PM (#8174651)
Either you need a trusted third party or you need to pass something that looks like (at best): 4UpbRAXYMgrESrAwiLPYymNNni1hwyL2JEK7zz2SN52t

You could do that by printing it on a business card or reading it over the phone, and then the other guy is going to have to type it in somewhere.

The reason trusted third party keeps on coming up, despite all the myriad fundamental problems, is exactly because slinging that around is so unattractive.

Re:What's the matter with PGP? by acqq on Thursday August 14, 2014 @01:30AM (#8176210)
There IS a nicer way to present fingerprints to be much more human readable: map every few bytes to the whole dictionary word. There is a RFC for that:

http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1751.txt

Re:What's the matter with PGP? by bostik on Wednesday August 13, 2014 @05:33PM (#8175119)
I've seen business cards with PGP fingerprints encoded as QR codes. That's a pretty neat idea.
Re:What's the matter with PGP? by nodata on Thursday August 14, 2014 @07:01AM (#8176874)
Except you never notice when someone switches the QR code, as Tomte says.
Re:What's the matter with PGP? by bostik on Thursday August 14, 2014 @03:16PM (#8179298)
Which is a very good point indeed.