Re:Polaroid Cube
by bagels on Monday August 11, 2014 @09:10PM
(#8166154)
Some f1 teams are profitable?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Polaroid Cube
by nebstrebor on Monday August 11, 2014 @10:46PM
(#8166399)
More are very unprofitable than not. http://www.forbes.com/sites/csylt/2014/05/25/formula-one-tea...
Are you joking?
It was not a joke, lots of teams have come and gone. I had to assume it was not profitable to run a team, much like any other form of auto racing.
Most teams that have endured are backed by large companies that can absorb losses, but I have never seen any books from any teams.
Re:Polaroid Cube
by bendecoste on Monday August 11, 2014 @10:33PM
(#8166373)
Sincerely curious, what kinds of profits do F1 teams make?
So a large team like Ferrari or McLaren will spend about $400 million on running the whole team for the year - that includes all salaries, R&D, simulation, transport, part costs, marketing etc.
They'll get about $80 million back on that from prize money (it's more like $100 million if you win).
Then there's the sponsorship - for a large team about $300 million a year is reasonable.
The rest can often be found from elsewhere. McLaren had large funding from Daimler until recently (when they received a $40 million fine Daimler paid) - Ferrari have a lot of their own money. F1 drives car sales, and the technology from F1 can be pulled back into the road cars - just look at McLaren's new models..