Re:Critical: Vulnerabilities in Windows TCP/IP Could Allow R...
by huhtenberg on Thursday September 10, 2009 @11:40AM
(#815447)
There is a good chance that they just put the pointer itself in a timestamp field, presumably allowing the responder to tweak it to point at something else.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Critical: Vulnerabilities in Windows TCP/IP Could Allow R...
by tptacek on Thursday September 10, 2009 @12:23PM
(#815545)
My read of the advisory was that it's a memory lifecycle issue --- having to do, as the advisory said, with not cleaning up state properly. Which, come to think about it, suggests that it's TCP timestamps --- IP timestamps are stateless.