News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Dress codes: Suitable disruption by PaulHoule on Wednesday August 06, 2014 @11:41AM (#8143029)
It's not necessarily a step forwards.

If you want to look good in a suit you can go get a $200 suit at any menswear store and if you want to look really good in a suit go spend $1500 for a tailored suit.

You can do either of these and get something acceptable without knowing anything about fashion.

If you want to look like a cultivated hipster, however, you have to work hard at it.

Re:Dress codes: Suitable disruption by Ixiaus on Wednesday August 06, 2014 @12:43PM (#8143345)
Disagree. I've been into Men's Fashion for about a year now and most menswear stores dress men like shit.

It's really hard to figure out your style, fit, and the items that compliment it but a man that has done that work communicates a lot IMHO. It's a holistic picture.

If it's clear you've put thought into something whether it's your body, your written or spoken words, your "costume", your app design, or your code design; that communicates far more than just selecting for anyone not wearing something casual.

I used to use a similar process for finding employees: cast my net for Haskell / Scala / Erlang and I'll find the best programmers. While that bias held true to a degree it also excludes a large swath of people that might actually be a better fit, my failing there is not developing a multi-dimensional and rigorous process for finding and vetting.

Re:Dress codes: Suitable disruption by logfromblammo on Wednesday August 06, 2014 @01:41PM (#8143732)
Point of fact: if I want to look good in a suit, I also have to spend at least six months strictly following a diet and exercise regime.

Other forms of apparel are much more forgiving.

Re:Dress codes: Suitable disruption by BSousa on Wednesday August 06, 2014 @03:36PM (#8144392)
Well, there are a lot of 'larger' men that look good in a suit. But they probably go for a double breasted one and tailor it right.

But even when I wasn't at my best, most suits are very forgiving in that area, it just needs to be tailored to your build (and not off the rack where they expect your shoulders, chest, hip be a certain generic proportion).

Re:Dress codes: Suitable disruption by jghn on Wednesday August 06, 2014 @03:34PM (#8144383)
I'm about as anti-suit as they come but this is patently false. A well tailored suit is about as forgiving as they come.
Re:Dress codes: Suitable disruption by logfromblammo on Wednesday August 06, 2014 @03:51PM (#8144477)
Adding "well-tailored" as a qualifying adjective is effectively begging the question. A well-tailored anything will make you look better than its off-the-shelf equivalent.

If we're just throwing free tailoring around, I'll also have my polo and khakis tailored, and then we can compare between them on the runway. It may well be that no style of clothing makes me look better than a suit, and that I still don't look good in one.

Re:Dress codes: Suitable disruption by TheCoelacanth on Thursday August 07, 2014 @11:49AM (#8148328)
I've found that a suit disguises my doughy physique better than anything short of a winter coat.