Re:In 'Sherlock Holmes' Rights Dispute, Conan Doyle Estate S...
by fiatmoney on Tuesday August 05, 2014 @11:35PM
(#8140860)
Or she could buy actual life insurance, rather than enforcing a bizarro version via a grant of monopoly whose value depends on the immediate commercial value of a creative work.
Re:In 'Sherlock Holmes' Rights Dispute, Conan Doyle Estate S...
by res0nat0r on Tuesday August 05, 2014 @11:56PM
(#8140925)
I'm guessing most authors don't write a book for life insurance purposes, just that the fact that a standard 15 year term is probably more beneficial to most people than a term based on when you die.
Re:In 'Sherlock Holmes' Rights Dispute, Conan Doyle Estate S...
by dingaling on Tuesday August 05, 2014 @11:53PM
(#8140917)
> so if the author conks right after her first book her family doesn't starve.
If I died one month after starting a new programming job, my employer wouldn't pay a salary to my family for 15 years.
I'm not sure why society has to take care of the family of an author but not a programmer.
Re:In 'Sherlock Holmes' Rights Dispute, Conan Doyle Estate S...
by PhasmaFelis on Wednesday August 06, 2014 @02:32AM
(#8141317)
That's not really at all comparable. With writing, unless you get an advance on an unwritten book, you first work for months or years unpaid, and then (if you're lucky) you get an up-front sale payment and then royalties for a while. What would you think if you started a new programming job, kicked the bucket after 29 days, and your employer tried to claim that they didn't have to give your last paycheck to your family because you didn't finish the month?
Death or 15 years seems fair to me.
Re:In 'Sherlock Holmes' Rights Dispute, Conan Doyle Estate S...
by rtpg on Wednesday August 06, 2014 @12:00AM
(#8140934)
If you built a house one month after you died, would you expect it to be given to the state?
IP is more about property than a job, I think.
Re:In 'Sherlock Holmes' Rights Dispute, Conan Doyle Estate S...
by dragonwriter on Wednesday August 06, 2014 @01:18AM
(#8141142)
> If you built a house one month after you died,
Nice trick, that.
Re:In 'Sherlock Holmes' Rights Dispute, Conan Doyle Estate S...
by ak217 on Wednesday August 06, 2014 @01:58AM
(#8141221)
Most of it, yes, in the form of estate taxes. Unless the heir is a spouse.
Hereditary transfer of IP is a bizarre anachronism.
Re:In 'Sherlock Holmes' Rights Dispute, Conan Doyle Estate S...
by JulianK on Wednesday August 06, 2014 @02:25AM
(#8141300)
John Oliver did a bit in his wealth gap segment where he mentioned that, in the US, estate taxes are exempt even to children on amounts up to 5 million, and up to 10 million if it's a couple leaving the amount to their children.
General searching around turns up these numbers here and there as well. Assuming that is in fact true, _most_ people shouldn't be giving up anything in estate taxes.
Re:In 'Sherlock Holmes' Rights Dispute, Conan Doyle Estate S...
by dragonwriter on Wednesday August 06, 2014 @11:28AM
(#8142937)
> Most of it, yes, in the form of estate taxes.
Estate taxes in the US are 40% and the first ~$5 million in value is exempt. So its impossible to lose most of any estate to estate taxes in the US, and very few estates (0.14% [1]) are subject to any estate tax at all.
Re:In 'Sherlock Holmes' Rights Dispute, Conan Doyle Estate S...
by baddox on Wednesday August 06, 2014 @03:03AM
(#8141382)
What if an author writes a book that no one wants to buy, right before croaking and leaving the family to starve? Most published books probably earn very little for their authors, yet people tend to think of a copyright as this guarantee of comfortable living.
I dunno about that. I think there should be a minimum term of, say, 15 years, so if the author conks right after her first book her family doesn't starve.