News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:In 'Sherlock Holmes' Rights Dispute, Conan Doyle Estate S... by mikeash on Tuesday August 05, 2014 @10:29PM (#8140709)
I think that would be decent. I don't particularly think a person should still be getting income from a copyrighted work they created the better part of a century ago just because they happen to still be alive, but I'm not strongly opposed to it either.
Re:In 'Sherlock Holmes' Rights Dispute, Conan Doyle Estate S... by mcb3k on Wednesday August 06, 2014 @11:20AM (#8142892)
I think that using just the fixed term would be better, just for simplicity's sake. How would it work if you have a collaborative novel? One author dies, the other continues living. What if the author goes missing? Changes their name, moves and leaves no forwarding address? How much effort do you need to put in to track down an author in order to re-print their works, or to tell if they're in the public domain?

It's much easier to just do a standard, fixed term for all copyrights.