News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Academic Urban Legends. Parent comment

Re:Academic Urban Legends by danieltillett on Tuesday August 05, 2014 @07:59PM (#8140223)
>Perhaps, one should not only try to cite the original source, but also look for recent research on the same topic?

This is (or should be) done standardly by all scientists. It is actually the best way to learn about a field. Find the key paper (or at least the paper the field thinks is key) and then read all the papers that cite that key paper.

I am sure this has been done by somebody, but it would be great to have this citation link structure as a graph where you could click on any node and read the paper.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Academic Urban Legends by kenjackson on Tuesday August 05, 2014 @11:33PM (#8140855)
The problem is that key papers are cited by a LOT of other papers, these with variable quality.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Academic Urban Legends by danieltillett on Wednesday August 06, 2014 @01:16AM (#8141135)
Yes they are, but there is no better way of finding those papers that can’t be found using keyword searches. I have found hundreds of critical papers over the years by using this technique that I would never have found in a thousand years using any other search method.
[ Parent | on HN ]