News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Entitlement issues (2009) by VLM on Tuesday August 05, 2014 @10:06AM (#8136921)
Site's dead. Can someone summarize better than the title?

(edited an hour later, nobody's posted a cache link and nobody's summarized the actual post... so all I got is along the lines of "somebody's expectations collided with reality" and a bunch of off topic yet interesting literary discussion. And it seems to have something to do with the multiple laptop power standards that I already know about for aircraft and their airlines)

Re:Entitlement issues (2009) by inspectahdeck on Tuesday August 05, 2014 @10:07AM (#8136931)
"George R.R. Martin is not your bitch."
Re:Entitlement issues (2009) by danielweber on Tuesday August 05, 2014 @10:13AM (#8136961)
That felt a little hostile; maybe I wasn't reading it in the proper voice, or reading the letter writer in the proper voice, but in my head the letter writer seemed to know that GRRM didn't owe him anything, and just wanted some more meat put on those bones of an idea.
Re:Entitlement issues (2009) by calibraxis on Tuesday August 05, 2014 @10:19AM (#8136990)
I think that even with free software authors, it's easy to act entitled to their work. (Undervaluing people's work is one of the world's great issues...)
Re:Entitlement issues (2009) by danielweber on Tuesday August 05, 2014 @10:31AM (#8137057)
True. I remember people getting angry at the TrueCrypt guy(?) for daring to quit.
Re:Entitlement issues (2009) by throw7 on Tuesday August 05, 2014 @10:59AM (#8137226)
American Airlines was not gaiman's bitch.