News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Prints by enneff on Sunday August 03, 2014 @08:31PM (#8129683)
This is one of the reasons Camlistore exists (http://camlistore.org). Its storage format was designed with digital archaeology in mind. If you can preserve the bits themselves, the format of the data should be self-evident.

The trick, of course, is making sure the bits are preserved. I hope that one day each of my descendants will keep an enneff.tar.gz somewhere in their files—much like the shoebox in the cupboard—so that future generations can see how cute my rabbits were.

Re:Prints by 4ad on Monday August 04, 2014 @05:37AM (#8130951)
The Camlistore storage format is self evident, however, most blobs you put in Camlistore are not. Maybe you can reverse engineer the Matroska container you keep your movies in, but can you reverse engineer h.264?

Even jpeg would be very hard to reverse engineer.

Presumably you can add instructions, or even source code, for decoding pictures, sounds and movies. But then you get into technical problems and there's no guarantee the average grand-grand-children of the future will have the skill or time to use these information.

Re:Prints by enneff on Wednesday August 06, 2014 @07:46PM (#8145527)
I doubt our great grandchildren will forget how to decode JPEG or h264. We haven't forgotten how to read Latin.
Re:Prints by icebraining on Monday August 04, 2014 @05:14AM (#8130909)
When you say "the format of the data should be self-evident", do you mean that Camlistore converts images and videos to simpler formats? I mean, JPEG is everywhere now, but fifty years from now, who knows? Maybe we should save them in PPM.