Re:Immutable Data Collections for Javascript
by sebmarkbage on Wednesday July 30, 2014 @11:46AM
(#8108888)
The difference is that if you use Object.observe to track changes, then you don't have the ability to hold onto the previous version of an object and know what the old value was.
This is important for animations where you want to animate from the object's old value to the new value.
Re:Immutable Data Collections for Javascript
by al2o3cr on Wednesday July 30, 2014 @04:45PM
(#8110835)
The objects passed to the Object.observe callback function describe both the new value and the old value, FWIW.
Re:Immutable Data Collections for Javascript
by Touche on Wednesday July 30, 2014 @12:58PM
(#8109404)
Isn't this library probably cloning?
Re:Immutable Data Collections for Javascript
by rojoca on Wednesday July 30, 2014 @02:33PM
(#8110100)
If you watch the linked video above you will see how clever persistent data structures mean that nothing is ever cloned or copied.
Re:Immutable Data Collections for Javascript
by bsimpson on Wednesday July 30, 2014 @07:36PM
(#8111610)
Good to know. I never got into immutable collections because I presumed they would result in things being allocated all the time (and that that would be expensive).
Re:Immutable Data Collections for Javascript
by nawitus on Wednesday July 30, 2014 @01:13PM
(#8109535)
I'd guess this library clones on modification, but I was talking about cloning the object on every function call.
Re:Immutable Data Collections for Javascript
by room271 on Wednesday July 30, 2014 @04:06PM
(#8110615)
Persistent data structures allow for the appearance of cloning (you have a new thing) but are much more efficient behind the scenes (you don't actually copy everything). So if you find yourself doing a lot of defensive cloning, then Mori or this library would probably be a lot faster for you.
Re:Immutable Data Collections for Javascript
by nawitus on Thursday July 31, 2014 @03:11PM
(#8116295)
Absolutely! If anyone is reading this, I recommend Eric Lippert's 11 part series on immutability in C#. The concept apply everywhere, of course.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ericlippert/archive/2007/11/13/immut...
I personally like the safety benefits of immutability. You can give objects to functions and not worry about the functions changing the object. The only way to guarantee that otherwise is to clone the object, but that takes quite a bit of performance.