News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Illegal prime number by TazeTSchnitzel on Wednesday July 30, 2014 @10:22AM (#8108281)
The thing about the illegal prime wasn't so much that it's "just a number", rather that it would be archived and published independently because it's a novel prime for mathematical value, not for the purpose of breaking DRM, hence providing an interesting test to free speech law (can you really say that a specific prime cannot be published in a list of primes simply because it happens to represent DeCSS's source code?)
Re:Illegal prime number by danielweber on Wednesday July 30, 2014 @11:20AM (#8108696)
The law is full of contradictions. Pointing out an inconsistency is not a victory[1]. One principle or the other will lose, and the one that loses might be yours.

[1] http://xkcd.com/651/