Re:Supreme Court’s new rules on abstract patents hit Apple v...
by Natsu on Tuesday July 29, 2014 @10:25PM
(#8106086)
Yeah, one would think that a widely infringed patent was a good signal that it was already obvious to those skilled in the art, but the patent bar seems to have this fantasy where people are reading patents and cackling gleefully stealing all the ideas from them. So they see it more as "massive business opportunity" than a signal that the system is not providing the alleged benefit to the public.
And to be honest, from those I've discussed it with, they are largely concerned with monetization and don't give a damn about any sort of public benefit.
And to be honest, from those I've discussed it with, they are largely concerned with monetization and don't give a damn about any sort of public benefit.