News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Robot With Broken Leg Learns To Walk Again In 2 Minutes by jimbokun on Tuesday July 29, 2014 @08:01PM (#8105688)
"Well, I think we'll merge humans and robots before having advanced AI robots."

That seems like extremely wishful thinking to me.

Anecdotally, it looks like progress in making machines do human like things is progressing much more quickly than reverse engineering the human brain.

Re:Robot With Broken Leg Learns To Walk Again In 2 Minutes by arjie on Tuesday July 29, 2014 @10:26PM (#8106087)
He doesn't mean human-like robots (with a human-like brain). He means a human brain with partly machine body.

Even that's real damn hard, though, and I'm not optimistic.

Re:Robot With Broken Leg Learns To Walk Again In 2 Minutes by efaref on Wednesday July 30, 2014 @06:45AM (#8107325)
I thought good progress was already being made with this, with devices like cochlear implants, retinal implants, and cyborg monkey arms: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxIgdOlT2cY
Re:Robot With Broken Leg Learns To Walk Again In 2 Minutes by dm2 on Wednesday July 30, 2014 @07:31AM (#8107478)
Yep, lots of teams working on BCIs.

The rapid learning by introducing an electric current at a specific certain parts of the brain: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcranial_direct-current_sti...

http://www.technologyreview.com/view/427177/diy-kit-overcloc...

BCIs are getting more and more attention. Imagine being able to hook up a processor, external storage, or even directly connecting to the internet using a BCI. Even connecting two brain is possible (and has been done). Some people say that one day we'll all be one connected organism, when we die just throw the brains in a big tank and let them live forever, like Futurama.

http://www.technologyreview.com/news/527561/military-funds-b...

http://www.army-technology.com/features/featurebrain-compute...

Re:Robot With Broken Leg Learns To Walk Again In 2 Minutes by bmh100 on Tuesday July 29, 2014 @10:54PM (#8106160)
It seems very accurate to me, when we consider how many non-permanently attached machines we already use. A smart phone, the Internet, search engines, prosthetic limbs, and cars would certainly allow for a powerful cyborg. Is the only major distinction that these are not permanently attached? Or does a cyborg also require neural interfaces?