Memory Leak Torpedoed Princeton's DARPA Chances

Re:Memory Leak Torpedoed Princeton's DARPA Chances by wyday on Saturday November 17, 2007 @03:07PM (#81002)

I wasn't arguing about the term "memory leak", but the misleading title's implication that it's a design flaw in the C# specification (or, for that matter, Microsoft's or Mono's implementation). It's not. It's a memory leak due to the programmers error.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Memory Leak Torpedoed Princeton's DARPA Chances by boucher on Saturday November 17, 2007 @03:14PM (#81005)

And I wasn't arguing that the title wasn't misleading. Just that while it may be slightly misleading, the article itself clearly puts it in context.

perhaps: "used to express reluctant or qualified agreement or acceptance."

[ Parent | on HN ]