Re:Rand Paul introduces bill to reform civil asset forfeiture
by tzs on Sunday July 27, 2014 @04:57PM
(#8093947)
That's not correct. If your property is seized, you can make a claim to get your property back regardless of whether or not the government ever files charges against you.
Re:Rand Paul introduces bill to reform civil asset forfeiture
by _delirium on Sunday July 27, 2014 @09:36AM
(#8092701)
Your last line is puzzling to me. Is civil asset forfeiture a set of laws designed to systematically discriminate against a particular demographic group for the benefit of the more powerful demographic group? Jim Crow was a set of laws passed by white southerners to segregate and disenfranchise black southerners, in order to establish a privileged position for their demographic group in society. Who are the white and black southerners, respectively, in your analogy?
Re:Rand Paul introduces bill to reform civil asset forfeiture
by throwaway0010 on Sunday July 27, 2014 @11:02AM
(#8092916)
It's not really an analogy; The divide is still along similar racial lines. Civil asset forfeiture laws predominantly impact poor black or Hispanic people. Here's what the ACLU has to say: https://www.aclu.org/criminal-law-reform/civil-asset-forfeit...
" Asset forfeiture practices often go hand-in-hand with racial profiling and disproportionately impact low-income African-American or Hispanic people who the police decide look suspicious and for whom the arcane process of trying to get one’s property back is an expensive challenge. ACLU believes that such routine “civil asset forfeiture” puts our civil liberties and property rights under assault, and calls for reform of state and federal civil asset forfeiture laws."
Re:Rand Paul introduces bill to reform civil asset forfeiture
by fnordfnordfnord on Sunday July 27, 2014 @01:04PM
(#8093272)
>Is civil asset forfeiture a set of laws designed to systematically discriminate against a particular demographic group for the benefit of the more powerful demographic group?
Probably not designed to have that effect, but it does.
Re:Rand Paul introduces bill to reform civil asset forfeiture
by chenelson on Sunday July 27, 2014 @02:46PM
(#8093580)
Yeah, Nixon's egalitarian crooking was often 'mistaken' for a Pinnacle-Empty Quiver, at least from a minority perspective. I guess some call it plausible deniablilty: "Corporatism done it, I ain't accountable!" For others, it might be something like Manifest Destiny, or historical inertia.
Re:Rand Paul introduces bill to reform civil asset forfeiture
by Fezzik on Monday July 28, 2014 @01:21AM
(#8095314)
Actually, that is not true at all. When your property is seized you get a single-sided notification letter, which you must sign, that very clearly & briefly articulates the claims process.*
* at least at the city level this is true; I review all the civil forfeiture requests made by a city and every affidavit contains a copy of said notification.
It's the new Jim Crow.