Netflix's Ken Florance: The Man Who Keeps the Video Streaming

Re:Netflix's Ken Florance: The Man Who Keeps the Video Strea... by pyre on Friday July 25, 2014 @01:44PM (#8086414)

Netflix has offered to setup devices within the ISP network that will cache the videos so that the ISP's users will stream from the cache rather than directly from Netflix. The ISPs have refused (presumably because it competes with their own offerings).

Everyone pretty much agrees that traffic over the ISP's internal networks aren't really an issue; the big issue is the traffic over the network connection points. There are solutions to alleviate this, but the ISPs aren't really interested in these solutions. They feel that their monopoly position gives them the power to dictate terms to everyone else, effectively holding their (paying) customers hostage for ransom.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Netflix's Ken Florance: The Man Who Keeps the Video Strea... by twoodfin on Friday July 25, 2014 @01:53PM (#8086463)

Everyone pretty much agrees that traffic over the ISP's internal networks aren't really an issue

Everyone agrees with this? How did we get to that conclusion? Netflix is 1/3 of primetime internet traffic. If they double their average bitrate * average viewing audience in, say, two years, that won't be a problem for ISPs' internal networks? They're that over-provisioned?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Netflix's Ken Florance: The Man Who Keeps the Video Strea... by dtparr on Friday July 25, 2014 @03:37PM (#8087194)

Obviously, you can't say something that broad for all ISPs in all locations. But in a recent dispute Verizon posted a graphic[1] showing that the max average peak utilization in their network was 65% of capacity. So if Netflix is 1/3 of that (say 22% capacity) and it doubles their average bitrate to all customers, it would still not saturate the link.

[1] http://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/verizo...

[ Parent | on HN ]