News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Notorious Airbnb squatter may be the dev behind two flail... by McGlockenshire on Thursday July 24, 2014 @07:49PM (#8083016)
See the previous coverage for the long version, but the tl;dr is that renters that rent for more than 30 days are protected as tenants by California law, including (normally proper) long drawn-out eviction proceedings.
Re:Notorious Airbnb squatter may be the dev behind two flail... by joeframbach on Thursday July 24, 2014 @08:13PM (#8083118)
Do you think Airbnb should make it difficult or impossible to put a room for rent for more than 30 days, then?
Re:Notorious Airbnb squatter may be the dev behind two flail... by darren884 on Thursday July 24, 2014 @07:50PM (#8083020)
Does that not mean you could live in the house too with a nice guard dog?
Re:Notorious Airbnb squatter may be the dev behind two flail... by thirtyseven on Thursday July 24, 2014 @07:54PM (#8083039)
They probably could sue you for tenant harassment.
Re:Notorious Airbnb squatter may be the dev behind two flail... by edwardhotchkiss on Thursday July 24, 2014 @09:39PM (#8083399)
Please see: Pacific Heights (1990)
Re:Notorious Airbnb squatter may be the dev behind two flail... by Nursie on Thursday July 24, 2014 @08:36PM (#8083198)
No, not if that was not under the original terms of the lease. You may own the building but in the eyes of the law it is the tenant's home and you can't throw them out onto the streets without due process.