“You’re not allowed bioinformatics anymore”

Re:“You’re not allowed bioinformatics anymore” by michaelhoffman on Thursday July 24, 2014 @11:01AM (#8079916)

Honestly, I am only irked when people insist that data must be used as a singular or that it must be used as a plural. You'll find it listed both ways in good dictionaries:

> Both constructions are standard. The plural construction is more common in print, evidently because the house style of several publishers mandates it.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/data

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:“You’re not allowed bioinformatics anymore” by dalke on Thursday July 24, 2014 @12:24PM (#8080480)

The commentary is a subset of what's in the wonderful M-W "Concise Dictionary of English Usage." The entry for "data, datum" starts "The word data is a queer fish."

The most complete online version of it that Google knows about is at http://www-old.accademiadellacrusca.it/forum/htdocs/phpBB2/v... .

Some key points and quotes:

- data isn't an ordinary plural. "Ordinary plurals ... can be modified by cardinal numbers; ... no one, it seems, can tell you how many data."

- "To summarize, data has never been the plural of a count noun in English. It is used in two constructions - plural, with plural apparatus, and singular, as a mass noun, with singular apparatus. Both constructions are fully standard at any level of formality. The plural construction is more common. If you are an editor for a publisher whose house style insists on the plural construction only, take care to be consistent ..."

- "There have been more occurrences of datum in popular sources since [about the middle 1960s]. Perhaps the insistence of many editors that data is a plural has accelerated the tendency for datum to be used as a singular of data"

[ Parent | on HN ]