Ask HN: AWS vs. self-hosted for collection of small apps

Posted by productionQA on Wednesday July 23, 2014 @12:51PM
from the ask-hn dept.

Hi All,

Curious about your thoughts on paying the $10-15/month for a small AWS instance (t1, t2) vs. a self-hosted server.

I have a small collection of apps I run, maybe 3 right now, that need to be available to the outside world, but that do not (and probably won't) see much traffic ever. The apps revolve around a small amount of users intentionally. The apps themselves are small, but a couple do require a database.

Should I just throw these on a machine, open a port, and self-host them, or should I grab a small EC2 instance and pay the small monthly fee?

Any benefits or cons to doing either?

( 1 comment | 2 points | on HN )

Re:Ask HN: AWS vs. self-hosted for collection of small apps by josekpaul on Wednesday July 23, 2014 @12:59PM (#8075446)

It sounds like you already have the infrastructure, and your requirements for scalability/uptime/etc. are not very high. In this case I would just go with the self-hosted solution.

[ Parent | on HN ]