Re:The Stanford Prison Experiment was flawed
by JulianK on Wednesday July 23, 2014 @12:51PM
(#8075370)
I think the reason why the experiment, if true, is so fascinating is because it's about normal people put into an abnormal situation rather than inherently bad people being given power.
What I take away from the experiment is that given the right situation and pressures, most people would do things they thought they would never otherwise do. More importantly, I think it's probably a mistake to think that you're the exception and are morally incorruptible.
Re:The Stanford Prison Experiment was flawed
by dmfdmf on Wednesday July 23, 2014 @01:26PM
(#8075615)
This is exactly the conclusion they want you to reach. Who are you to judge? Who are you to condemn anyone since you are evil too? This is the charter of liberty for evil and all evil needs to survive, even prosper. This "experiment" is the biblical tenet of Original Sin masquerading as science and I reject it. If your moral principles cannot be practiced consistently by all men then something is wrong with your principles, not human nature.
Re:The Stanford Prison Experiment was flawed
by threatofrain on Wednesday July 23, 2014 @10:02PM
(#8077896)
The conclusion would essentially say that some social structures are more explanatory of behavior than individual psychology. Given how much importance people place on personal idiosyncrasy or psychology, I'd say this is pretty cool if better confirmed.
Re:The Stanford Prison Experiment was flawed
by dmfdmf on Thursday July 24, 2014 @11:06AM
(#8079952)
Why qualify it with "some" social structures? You could come right out and say it like Karl Marx that social structures explain behavior -- but then you'd have the same problem he did which is that it reverses cause and effect.
NB: I am not saying everyone is evil.