News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Review: Amazon’s Fire Phone by Lagged2Death on Wednesday July 23, 2014 @10:15AM (#8074455)
Getting us to call these usurious loans "subsidies" is probably the most ingenious bit of underhanded marketing the cell carriers ever concocted.

I think you should generally be suspicious when a vendor tries to get you, the customer, to use the vendor's own internal jargon. As a customer, I shouldn't need to know your jargon; I don't give a shit about your internal policies and terms. If you're encouraging me to speak your unnatural language, you're probably trying to give me a false sense of security and savvy that makes it easier to pick my pocket.

One sees similar moves in many complicated transactions like real estate, automobile leases and purchases, etc.

Re:Review: Amazon’s Fire Phone by VLM on Wednesday July 23, 2014 @12:18PM (#8075154)
"usurious loans"

Beyond the correct analysis of marketing-speak the market looks like contract phones are basically a "worse than payday loan" interest rate of a couple hundred bucks and couple year payback period. So you get a $500 phone at a cost of maybe $2000 over the course of the loan. The MVNO resellers mostly seem to go prepay, I know I paid $300 for my phone some time ago, but I only pay $22 per month for voice and psuedo-unlimited data so I'm pretty happy.

It is interesting that Amazon is kinda in between, kinda a subprime loan seller and kinda a phone service reseller, probably for financial reasons.

Amazon does seem to be financializing itself, they do push their credit card every time I buy. It is no great modification to drift sideways into phone loans.

In the long run I expect to see them continue to financialize themselves into perhaps subprime car loans (outright buy Car Max or a competitor?) and eventually home equity loans (to buy more stuff at Amazon) or home loans (complete with prime membership to help fill your house with trinkets from china)

So it makes sense as a grand strategy thing to move away from Amazon the book retailer and into Amazon the bank. Nobody in America can make a living doing anything but FIRE sector in the long run by intentional regulation, so they kinda have to do this.

Re:Review: Amazon’s Fire Phone by wlesieutre on Wednesday July 23, 2014 @04:53PM (#8076902)
What carrier is your $22 pseudo-unlimited data though? I'm looking at some alternatives and T-Mobile's $30 unlimited seems like a decent bet. But $22 for pseudo-unlimited would still be a step up from AT&T's 300 MB plan that I'm on.
Re:Review: Amazon’s Fire Phone by seanflyon on Wednesday July 23, 2014 @05:13PM (#8076993)
I pay $25 a month for actually unlimited data and text and talk. Republic Wireless can afford to do this because they are a wifi first provider meaning that when I make calls at home or at work it goes over wifi costing them nothing.
Re:Review: Amazon’s Fire Phone by peatmoss on Wednesday July 23, 2014 @12:21PM (#8075175)
Thank you. I've been grumbling about subsidies for a long time, while still calling them subsidies. You're right though. They're extremely high-interest loans that nobody in their right mind would ever willingly take out.
Re:Review: Amazon’s Fire Phone by r00fus on Wednesday July 23, 2014 @04:36PM (#8076817)
Hear, hear. T-Mobile calls it what it is - a 0% rate equipment loan. That's what shows up on my statement.