In terms of editors I've hit this a bit, attempting to follow tutorials or the like is frequently met with 'step n: install the clojure plugin for Emacs', then 'eval with <Emacs keybinding>' forever after. The Om tutorials iirc are written as tutorials through Light Table (which seems like a great editor). Having to separate learning about the language and how the editor does things just increases the barrier to entry.
What is Om? I can't seem to google it.
I want multiple workflows. A single build tool can accommodate that, but Leiningen can't/doesn't.
For example, let's say I have a compiler called mycc. I can build something like this:
mycc main.c -o main
find . -name '*.c' | entr mycc main.c -o main
> As far as editors go, I'm perplexed. You can use nearly any editor, why do you perceive the need to use one of these 2?
Then why do nearly all (probably 95%) Clojure devs use either Emacs or LightTable?
I'm confused as to why you think leiningen has to do it all.
I'm also not sure what you mean by auto rebuilder (for clojurescript I use the auto feature of cljsbuild ...). My workflow starts with starting a REPL.
Also, I use vim very happily, many people use Cursive happily. But the reason there seem to be fewer editors in use is that REPL integration is so useful that only those editors with good REPL features end up being used. Clojure's ecosystem isn't stopping anyone from using other editors, those editors just haven't implemented a specific feature that is extraordinarily useful when writing Clojure.
I may have misunderstood you but it seems like you are seeing problems that don't exist because the solutions look different than what you expect.
1) Fast builds so I can set up an auto-build script.
2) A Leinengen daemon so I don't have to worry about building at all.
3) ClojureScript so I can just refresh the browser.
As far as I can tell none of these are possible. If I am wrong please correct me.
My project I described before is a web app, and my workflow involves my editor, a browser, a clojure repl, a clojurescript browser repl that runs code in the browser and a shell script that runs the various watchers I described before.
If I change any clojure file the browser refreshes automatically (and my tests run automatically).
If I change any clojurescript file it gets rebuilt automatically and the js file is reloaded in the browser (just the js, not a full page refresh)
If I change any sass file, it gets rebuild and the css in the browser refreshes (just the css)
If I change any html template then, depending on the template, either the page is refreshed or my clojurescript is rebuilt and the js refreshed.
So all those things are possible (I saw a cool post the other day of some ring middleware to handle using clojurescript inside <script> tags transparently).
The non-clojure stuff is handled completely outside of the clojure ecosystem, I was using LiveReload and Guard when doing python dev to get that partial refresh on file save functionality and it was pretty simple to hook clojure into that same workflow.
I will say that if you are doing a lot of compile time template processing in your clojurescript like I am (using Kioo/Om/React.js) then the compile time for the clojurescript can be a little long, but since I have a browser REPL I do my experimental stuff in there instead of hitting that recompile cycle frequently so it's only a minor imperfection in practice.
So I definitely don't worry about building at all, and I don't even have to refresh my browser thanks to LiveReload - I just have to hit save in my editor.
There unfortunately aren't a lot of tutorials for setting this kind of thing up. I've got a start on writing up my setup and will put the project skeleton on github soon-ish ... I have this damn real work that keeps getting in the way.
I use Emacs w/ Cider to connect to a REPL session to develop my application.
Another person uses vim and "lein run" and "lein repl".
Yet another uses Cursive (IntelliJ-based) for everything.
Have you looked at Leiningen profiles? https://github.com/technomancy/leiningen/blob/stable/doc/PRO...
Plugins? https://github.com/technomancy/leiningen/wiki/Plugins
It seems to me that Leiningen is quite active with its extensibility, especially given how young it is.
If those don't work, have you considered wrapping it with your own scripting?
Have you raised your concerns on the mailing list? People would be open to discussing them.
What I dislike is the need to run a background task per-project, every time I work on the project. What I would like is either:
1) Faster (sub 500ms) compile times so that I can flexibly use a workflow I prefer.
2) A "Leiningen daemon" that runs when I start my computer and automatically compiles any project.clj files that exist.
3) ClojureScript to build in the browser, so that my workflow can be any text editor + refresh the browser.
Leiningen plugins cannot give me any of those things, correct?
The JVM way of doing things is different but not inferior. You extend Leiningen with Leiningen plugins written in JVM languages, not with external tools. Yes, you can do everything you would ever want to do.
This has never worked for me with Clojure. I'd enjoy a more specific example.
> A Leiningen daemon is very easy to create.
Could you explain more? I specifically want 1 Lein daemon for all projects, not 1 per project. I want to be able to create new projects on the fly. I only want this feature because the ClojureScript build process is too slow to do on demand.
Why should it even be a question?!
Seeing it this way is a mistake. Most developers use tools they are comfortable with, and beginners use what they see in tutorials.
Now about why this repartition, well: Clojure allows you to work with a REPL. Therefore, it's no surprise that developers stick to the "few" editors that allow this style of development. You can see this going with Scala, too.
This said, nothing I know of in Clojure forces you to stick to those editors. Most Java developers use Eclipse or Netbeans, yet, nothing prevents you to use IntelliJ.
As far as editors go, I'm perplexed. You can use nearly any editor, why do you perceive the need to use one of these 2?