I'd say sorry you were offended, but i find your frustration comical, so i guess i will say thank you instead.
And the standing army thing is ... odd. Related: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_...
As i see it happening, if there was a land war it would be fast and devastating in a very pointed way. Arguably suicidal incursions into city centers by specops chaps and gung ho paramilitary types using drones and wire cutters and wearing all manor of different uniform or guise. Then it is the blitz. This advance must occur before and effective air assault can be made.
All this to say it would go from peace to war in a matter of minutes to hours depending on your position. I don't see the Army of the Union responding very well to that.
This is all off topic really though, because i am more interested on the perspective of life through the war. That is why i asked. My answer changes like the wind.
So, what would you do?
AFAIK, the only European country that doesn't fund a standing military (besides some of the microstates, like Andorra) is Iceland.
Also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO#French_withdrawal plus http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care_in_France
Also: France, Germany, UK and Italy spend as much combined as China does, ignoring the rest of the European countries.
Also: your fantasy that European healthcare can be afforded due to American military spending is offensive, wrong, and appears to be a bewildered reaction to "How are we the only rich country who have screwed up our healthcare provision so badly?"