News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Rhode Island unintentionally decriminalized indoor prostitution in 2003. Parent comment

Re:Rhode Island unintentionally decriminalized indoor prosti... by heylefty on Friday July 18, 2014 @07:56PM (#8056172)
There is never a balance of power between the employer and the employee.

If there were, the employee wouldn't have to work for the employer, since he'd have just as much money and influence in the first place.

Your argument condemns all employment.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Rhode Island unintentionally decriminalized indoor prosti... by IanCal on Sunday July 20, 2014 @12:18PM (#8060701)
> If there were, the employee wouldn't have to work for the employer, since he'd have just as much money and influence in the first place.

So the employer needs no employees?

> Your argument condemns all employment.

Only exploitative employment.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Rhode Island unintentionally decriminalized indoor prosti... by saraid216 on Friday July 18, 2014 @09:43PM (#8056394)
I'm okay with that condemnation. Do you have a real refutation?
[ Parent | on HN ]