Re:Ask HN: Recruiter Blackmail
by tptacek on Wednesday July 16, 2014 @12:04PM
(#8042752)
His motives seem obviously to be malign, but what's the theory under which he's liable for damages?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
If I say "tortious interference" is that adequately specific?
If the OP doesn't get fired, it might be tough for him (her?) to prove that he suffered any damages, a sine qua non of that kind of claim. [1]
[1] E.g., http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/intentional_interference_with...
I guess. You'd have to demonstrate malice on the part of the recruiter, since simply sharing the fact that the client is looking for work probably isn't independently tortious. I guess I see it, now.
Well, like if said I'm not a lawyer, but if the recruiter acted to malign and it resulted in termination, I feel like there may be something there. Certainly in that case it would be at least worth consulting someone.