Show HN: Tiny VPSs without exhausting IPv4 addresses

Re:Show HN: Tiny VPSs without exhausting IPv4 addresses by bluedino on Monday July 14, 2014 @01:42PM (#8032136)

64MB? 128MB? What applications are there for that little RAM except maybe an IRC shell?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: Tiny VPSs without exhausting IPv4 addresses by hrjet on Monday July 14, 2014 @01:45PM (#8032159)

I was running a Twitter client (servlet + Postgres) in a 64MB VPS not too long ago. There were about ~2000 active users.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: Tiny VPSs without exhausting IPv4 addresses by Kadin on Monday July 14, 2014 @02:12PM (#8032306)

Statically-rendered websites (Jekyll, Blosxom, etc.) would work fine.

Though having a weird port number on a blog URL would probably cause me to think twice before clicking on it, at least from a bare-metal Windows machine; it makes me think "botnet dropper".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: Tiny VPSs without exhausting IPv4 addresses by vznatvps on Monday July 14, 2014 @02:13PM (#8032311)

We can offer clients the ability to reverse proxy their domain to their VPS so they wouldn't need to append a port.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: Tiny VPSs without exhausting IPv4 addresses by vznatvps on Monday July 14, 2014 @01:49PM (#8032180)

You can run a whole LAMP stack on that.

EDIT: That being the 64MB.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: Tiny VPSs without exhausting IPv4 addresses by kephra on Monday July 14, 2014 @01:58PM (#8032229)

even worse: 64MB of VZ memory is much less then 64MB of real memory, as VZ limits allocated and not dirty memory.

[ Parent | on HN ]