News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Named parameters in C. Parent comment

Re:Named parameters in C by micampe on Monday July 14, 2014 @10:02AM (#8030928)
I find your statement puzzling. A GNU extension is by definition not “strictly valid C”, compound literals are valid C because they are defined in C99.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Named parameters in C by comex on Monday July 14, 2014 @10:17AM (#8031002)
Compound literals are valid C; compound statements, used in the macros in the article, are a GNU extension.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Named parameters in C by micampe on Monday July 14, 2014 @10:44AM (#8031138)
Oh right, I misread the previous comment, thanks.
[ Parent | on HN ]