News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Rust for functional programmers by knz42 on Sunday July 13, 2014 @01:24PM (#8027982)
The "stuff about boxing" has been discussed on the reddit thread, and I will have it fixed by tomorrow. Thanks for highlighting.

As to "Gc not being clever", the code is clear that it is intended to be clever in the long run, so the essence of the message could stay. Maybe the wording could be made more precise, thanks again for highlighting.

As to the "number of other wrong or slightly wrong things", I would be more than happy to fix the text if you have concrete remarks.

Re:Rust for functional programmers by berdario on Sunday July 13, 2014 @02:04PM (#8028138)
I'd like to know what is exactly wrong, I tried to look for the reddit thread, assuming it would've been this one:

http://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/2al19j/rust_for_functi...

but there're no comments as of now

EDIT: found it

http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2akz51/rust_for...