Re:Show HN: Learn to code by being coached by an experienced...
by Machow on Thursday July 10, 2014 @08:26PM
(#8018228)
This seems to be exactly the case in psychology. Undergraduate students often assist with experiments in return for research experience on their resumes. Depending on the degree to which they were involved in a project, they may be thanked in a paper, but not listed as a coauthor.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Show HN: Learn to code by being coached by an experienced...
by nmrm on Friday July 11, 2014 @11:05AM
(#8020466)
Research is significantly different from private, for-profit business.
And those studies are always IRB-approved. The IRB takes into account the conflict of interest, and will sometimes protest if you don't pay the student subjects (e.g. if the study involves a significant time commitment).
Re:Show HN: Learn to code by being coached by an experienced...
by Machow on Sunday July 13, 2014 @09:31AM
(#8027294)
I'm not talking about students who participate in experiments as subjects. The students who are research assistants are sometimes unpaid, and might not receive course credit for RA work, but contribute code to projects for research experience. It's relevant to working for a private, for-profit business in the sense that the alternative is often doing an internship for a private company.
The IRB only monitors study participants, not research assistant work.
Re:Show HN: Learn to code by being coached by an experienced...
by nmrm on Sunday July 13, 2014 @02:50PM
(#8028260)
Ah, I misinterpreted your comment. Sorry.
> It's relevant to working for a private, for-profit business in the sense that the alternative is often doing an internship for a private company.
I still think there's a pretty significant ethical difference between not-for-profit research and a for-profit business. Even without the student-teacher relationship, unpaid internships in CS are pretty ethically dubious and uncommon.