Book review: Bad Pharma

Re:Book review: Bad Pharma by jpatokal on Thursday July 10, 2014 @07:53AM (#8014601)

Try reading his blog then. He's not rebutting it word for word, of course, but he makes it fairly obvious there are some rather large and often fundamental holes in Piketty's arguments:

http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2014/06/17/book-review-pi...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Book review: Bad Pharma by PM_Tech on Thursday July 10, 2014 @07:58AM (#8014612)

No I am good thanks. I will just discount it. I don't consider a blog post a suitable way to analyse the magnum opus of an economist of the stature of Piketty.

EDIT : Curiousity got the better of me. I read the review of Capital.

I stopped at this line -

"Here are some ideas, some taken from my 2009 economic recovery plan for the U.S."

The author is a supremely talented electrical engineer. Stick to that instead of whining "No one listened to my economics ideas."

Last time I checked, economists don't post blogs claiming no one is listening to their ideas about microprocessors or front end development.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Book review: Bad Pharma by Tyrannosaurs on Friday July 11, 2014 @05:11AM (#8019350)

As an analysis it's a little all over the place.

The first half says "this is why Piketty is (probably) wrong about there being a problem" and the second half saying "and he's wrong about what we should do about it, here's what we should do instead".

Surely if there is no problem, the there is nothing which needs to be done about it?

[ Parent | on HN ]