News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The bar for success in our industry is too low by ccc3 on Wednesday September 02, 2009 @12:42PM (#800538)
By definition there is not a single business that is profitable from day one. A plumbing business isn't profitable until the tools and vehicles have been paid for.

The important consideration is the size of the deficit (in time or money or ownership) a company accepts and what they gain in exchange. And the bigger the deficit, the higher the stakes.

Re:The bar for success in our industry is too low by thaumaturgy on Wednesday September 02, 2009 @12:47PM (#800545)
I bootstrapped a consulting business, and didn't have any savings at all to do it. I had to be profitable from day one.

I did not even have a laptop at the time (for network diagnostics and the like) -- I just had my experience.

I've had to learn an awful lot about resource management as a result of doing it this way, and I'm grateful for that.

Re:The bar for success in our industry is too low by ccc3 on Wednesday September 02, 2009 @01:10PM (#800609)
presumably there was a significant cost in time and/or money required to gain that experience.
Re:The bar for success in our industry is too low by RyanMcGreal on Wednesday September 02, 2009 @01:42PM (#800700)
You've got to live anyway. Might as well pay attention while you're doing it.
Re:The bar for success in our industry is too low by dmose on Wednesday September 02, 2009 @12:51PM (#800555)
I would argue that prostitution is profitable from day one..
[deleted]
Re:The bar for success in our industry is too low by _b8r0 on Wednesday September 02, 2009 @01:57PM (#800732)
That depends on whether your parents are perceived as VC's providing seed capital.
Re:The bar for success in our industry is too low by mbrubeck on Wednesday September 16, 2009 @07:24PM (#827049)
Now I really want to know what was in that deleted comment.
Re:The bar for success in our industry is too low by graphene on Wednesday September 02, 2009 @12:53PM (#800559)
technically, I don't think that's quite true; a company can book profits even as it's paying off a loan which is bigger than the profits or even than total turnover as long as (operational cash flow) - (interest payments) > 0.

I think it's perfectly possible for, say, a company funded by VCs to be profitable from the start of operations, since the money that bought the equity isn't expected to be paid back.