Re:The bar for success in our industry is too low
by thaumaturgy on Wednesday September 02, 2009 @12:47PM
(#800545)
I bootstrapped a consulting business, and didn't have any savings at all to do it. I had to be profitable from day one.
I did not even have a laptop at the time (for network diagnostics and the like) -- I just had my experience.
I've had to learn an awful lot about resource management as a result of doing it this way, and I'm grateful for that.
Re:The bar for success in our industry is too low
by ccc3 on Wednesday September 02, 2009 @01:10PM
(#800609)
presumably there was a significant cost in time and/or money required to gain that experience.
Re:The bar for success in our industry is too low
by RyanMcGreal on Wednesday September 02, 2009 @01:42PM
(#800700)
You've got to live anyway. Might as well pay attention while you're doing it.
Re:The bar for success in our industry is too low
by dmose on Wednesday September 02, 2009 @12:51PM
(#800555)
I would argue that prostitution is profitable from day one..
[deleted]
Re:The bar for success in our industry is too low
by _b8r0 on Wednesday September 02, 2009 @01:57PM
(#800732)
That depends on whether your parents are perceived as VC's providing seed capital.
Re:The bar for success in our industry is too low
by mbrubeck on Wednesday September 16, 2009 @07:24PM
(#827049)
Now I really want to know what was in that deleted comment.
Re:The bar for success in our industry is too low
by graphene on Wednesday September 02, 2009 @12:53PM
(#800559)
technically, I don't think that's quite true; a company can book profits even as it's paying off a loan which is bigger than the profits or even than total turnover as long as (operational cash flow) - (interest payments) > 0.
I think it's perfectly possible for, say, a company funded by VCs to be profitable from the start of operations, since the money that bought the equity isn't expected to be paid back.
The important consideration is the size of the deficit (in time or money or ownership) a company accepts and what they gain in exchange. And the bigger the deficit, the higher the stakes.