http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I/chapter-73
This is the federal obstruction of justice statute, could you point out the part that applies to jamming the illegal collection of inadmissible evidence by an agency that enforces no laws or regulations and conducts no criminal or administrative investigations or proceedings?
You're absolutely right. The government, NSA, et al, would definitely not take anyone to court over this. That's the wrong tool for this job.
Re:Jamming XKeyScore
by almondsays on Sunday July 06, 2014 @05:07AM
(#7994110)
No, I'm not a lawyer and/or qualified to do that. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't care to find out by attempting it.
This is an unintentionally perfect demonstration of the concept of chilling effects. Someone should take a screenshot of this and put it into a textbook.
Wikipedia link on chilling effects: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chilling_effect
The fear of getting caught shouldn't be the only reason you don't do something. Either it's important enough to do, or there's multiple reasons doing something isn't a good idea.
Re:Jamming XKeyScore
by fnordfnordfnord on Sunday July 06, 2014 @11:57AM
(#7994808)
Trolling the NSA to prosecute someone for 'obstruction of justice' for essentially being a nuisance, is a dream scenario for the ACLU/EFF/EPIC/et al.
edited to be more verbose