Re:Helium.co: Connect devices to the web without Wi-Fi, Blue...
by notthetup on Thursday July 03, 2014 @01:14AM
(#7981552)
I think the website compares it to BluetoothLE which is a really low energy. But typical BluetoothLE data rates are much much lower than 250Kbits/s.
I'm still surprised that they can bring it down to lesser active current draw than BluetoothLE which was designed for low-data rate, low current draw, short distance comms.
Edit : Here's a app note on real life current draw of TI's BluetoothLE solution.
I'm still surprised that they can bring it down to lesser active current draw than BluetoothLE which was designed for low-data rate, low current draw, short distance comms.
Edit : Here's a app note on real life current draw of TI's BluetoothLE solution.
http://www.ti.com/lit/an/swra347a/swra347a.pdf
Edit 2: Here's another research paper comparing ZigBee and BLE solution's current draws. ZigBee is almost an order magnitude larger in current draw.
http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/192688/IWS%202013%20wirel...
Edit 3: Old but good presentation on power usage in 802.15.4. http://www.cens.ucla.edu/sensys03/sensys03-callaway.pdf