News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sick of Ruby, dynamic typing, side effects, and object-or... by bad_user on Wednesday July 02, 2014 @05:49AM (#7976016)
Akka has to expose the actor registry, has to handle network connectivity issues and scalability issues, which means messages have to go through actors posing as proxies and routers; and actors may be dynamically created - and also because of the async model, actors can and must change/adapt their interface asynchronously, like when doing back-pressure and waiting for acknowledgement that a message was received on the other end, during which there can be no progress, as in "context.become", fundamental for the actor model - which actually renders static typing useless.

Saying that Haskell's distributed-process solves the problems that Akka is solving is short-sighted and wrong. But then again, the main reason for why Haskell hasn't attracted me has nothing to do with technicalities and everything to do with a vocal minority of Haskell users that I find totally repulsive.

Re:Sick of Ruby, dynamic typing, side effects, and object-or... by frowaway001 on Wednesday July 02, 2014 @06:46AM (#7976160)
> But then again, the main reason for why Haskell hasn't attracted me has nothing to do with technicalities and everything to do with a vocal minority of Haskell users that I find totally repulsive.

This.

> The expression problem can be solved in Haskell in a straightforward manner using type classes.

Lol, WUT? No.

Btw, I think that you are actually trying to lecture Scala people about typeclasses just shows how clueless you are.