Re:No-IP's Formal Statement on Microsoft Takedown
by dlgeek on Monday June 30, 2014 @08:33PM
(#7968585)
The plaintiff (Microsoft) is responsible for serving that summons, not the court (The court just issues it). The court didn't even certify the summons until 6/19, and there's no record of service, so we don't know when Microsoft served No-Ip.
That summons also says they have 21 days to respond, which, even if they were served on 6/19, hasn't elapsed yet.
EDIT: mikeryan's post above mine is even more clear - it looks like as soon as they opened the suit, they petitioned for the TRO without notifying NoIP and the court specifically granted them the right to not notify until after the TRO was served.
That summons also says they have 21 days to respond, which, even if they were served on 6/19, hasn't elapsed yet.
EDIT: mikeryan's post above mine is even more clear - it looks like as soon as they opened the suit, they petitioned for the TRO without notifying NoIP and the court specifically granted them the right to not notify until after the TRO was served.