News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Go Is Not Good by Dewie on Sunday June 29, 2014 @05:24PM (#7962471)
> Go aims to be more simple and concise, in the end you write less code to do the same thing, as you would in C++, Haskell or Rust..

I sincerely doubt that Go is more concise than Haskell. I won't say whether concise is good or bad, but I very much doubt that Go is the most concise.

Re:Why Go Is Not Good by ponce on Monday June 30, 2014 @05:39PM (#7967897)
Go doesn't allow to create reusable, zero-cost abstractions so I guess it's not more concise than C++ either.