Every story and comment from the Hacker News API, in a layout borrowed from 2001.
A comment on How a mathematician constructed a decision tree to solve a medical problem. Parent comment
I see nothing in http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=frenkel+Arutyunyan+kidne... and given the context, it was likely buried in an obscure Russian journal & so of no value to English readers anyway.
> This article is really crappy and doesn't explain what they did at all.
Seems like a good explanation to me.
> For example, why diddn't they mention probabilist networks, which dominates this field.
Because those weren't used much back then.
> And I doubt that 240 data points is enough to write a paper.
Sure it is. Why wouldn't n=240 work?
I see nothing in http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=frenkel+Arutyunyan+kidne... and given the context, it was likely buried in an obscure Russian journal & so of no value to English readers anyway.
> This article is really crappy and doesn't explain what they did at all.
Seems like a good explanation to me.
> For example, why diddn't they mention probabilist networks, which dominates this field.
Because those weren't used much back then.
> And I doubt that 240 data points is enough to write a paper.
Sure it is. Why wouldn't n=240 work?