Re:San Francisco would be a much better city with twice the ...
by 01Michael10 on Friday June 27, 2014 @07:48PM
(#7956818)
Was the idea of this article really to make SF more crappy (and more like other big cities) so then it would be less desirable by higher income people which would drive rent prices down?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:San Francisco would be a much better city with twice the ...
by 01Michael10 on Saturday June 28, 2014 @10:41AM
(#7958307)
I am not sure why my comment was down voted but guess I should expound on my flip comment more...
Increased population density for cities and less sprawl is something I generally agree with but not so much for SF. It's a very unique city with few issues and apparently the people who live there can afford the rents. I think creating high rise residential buildings and doubling the population would ruin that city.
Now, Buffalo (pop. little over 400,000) on the other hand, where I live could really benefit from increased population density. We have been destroyed by suburban sprawl over the years which has resulted in unnecessary higher taxes for everyone and other issues.